Conor Jackson won't turn 26 until Mary, but he'll likely hit more homers than his age this year.
AP
By Gary Gramling, SI.com
Every Thursday from now until September, you can come here to find an in-depth look at fantasy baseball's sell-high and buy-low candidates. But, as anyone with a sundial can see (thanks SkyMall!), it's still February. Since most auctions and drafts haven't taken place just yet, we'll spend the next few weeks taking a closer look at the boom and bust picks at each position.
This week, we'll look at corner infielders ...
BUY LOW
Conor Jackson, 1B, Diamondbacks: Seems like that new prospect smell has worn off of Jackson. He's entering his third season. And he spent his second season sharing time with Tony Clark, who is old enough to be portrayed by Morgan Freeman should the D'Backs' 2007 season be made into a movie. Or Ben Vereen if it's an off-Broadway play. (With Elijah Wood as Eric Byrnes. This thing actually writes itself.)
But this is the first year that Jackson looks poised for a breakout that only Clearasil can stop. And a lot of it has to do with simple math. With Clark out of the picture, and assuming Arizona doesn't ink, say Jack Clark between now and Opening Day, Jackson figures to see about a 25-percent increase in playing time at least. So even if he stays at exactly last year's levels, Jackson is looking at a .284, 19-HR, 75-RBI, 70-run season.
But Jackson isn't 26 until May. And he hit .308 with 25 extra-base hits -- including 10 homers -- in just 182 at-bats after the All-Star break last season. He slugged .555 in that span. He's not a 40-home run masher, but the power is coming. A 30-HR season is within reach in ‘08.
Jackson is slipping outside the top 20 first basemen in a lot of drafts, but he's definitely better than that. He could be top 10 by midseason.
Hank Blalock, 3B, Rangers: This sounds like an episode of House. Blalock was suffering from tingling and numbness in his arm last season. So doctors fixed the problem by removing a rib. Obviously.
But according to reports, so far so good. And not just because of the obvious commercial tie-ins with the McRib. Blalock was able to DH last season. And he's making throws across the diamond this spring. But there's more reason for optimism than a return to health.
Blalock's Achilles' heal has always been an inability to hit lefties. Entering last season, he had a career .221 mark against southpaws, striking out once every 4.1 at-bats. In his disappointing 2006 season, Blalock hit them at a .216 clip. Small sample size alert. Blalock only logged 47 at-bats against lefties last season, but he hit them at a .298 clip, striking out once every 5.2 at-bats.
Better yet, after Blalock returned last September, he hit .313 with five homers in just 64 at-bats. Obviously, he's one of the riskiest picks in fantasy baseball -- his success against lefties last season might have been a fluke. But like the McRib, Blalock might only come this cheap for a limited time.
SELL HIGH
Daric Barton, 1B, A's: I like Barton. I really do. Not in a weird way. I just like the fact that he hits a lot of line drives. And he's patient, but doesn't strike out much. And he's a young lefty hitter who holds his own against southpaws. And I hear he has an enchanting musk. OK, that last one is weird.
So I can understand why fantasy leaguers are ready to pounce on Barton. But in re-draft leagues, it's a mistake. He's a 22-year-old who hasn't shown more than gap power, even in the hitter-friendly Pacific Coast League. And now he'll play half his games in pitcher-friendly McAfee Coliseum. There's 30-homer potential, but it's unlikely to show up for another season or so.
And Barton isn't exactly joining a high-powered offense. He'll likely bat second this season, limiting his RBI opportunities. Barton will hit for average and get on base, but he'll likely be counting on the ghost of Eric Chavez and Mitchell Report star Jack Cust to drive him in.
Even if he plays up to his future All-Star status, it's tough to see Barton producing well enough to be a top 20 first baseman.
Josh Fields, 3B, White Sox: Remember "productive outs"? It was the in thing to do a couple years back when the Florida Marlins were winning titles behind Juan Pierre & Company. It's a fad that has gone the way of the pet rock, Ska music, and Matthew McConaughey films (well, hopefully on that last one).
Except PO's, not Sabermetrics, are still the "in" thing for Ozzie Guillen. And that's bad news for Fields. Guillen will probably go out of his mind with new OF Nick Swisher's patient approach at the plate. But Swisher is a proven producer who came to Chicago for a heavy price.
Fields, on the other hand, is relatively unproven, and strikes out even more often than Swisher does. And despite legitimate 30-home run power, Fields isn't going to make many productive outs striking out more than once every three at-bats (as he did last season).
Unless Kenny Williams swings another deal, Swisher and Jermaine Dye are guaranteed spots in the outfield. Jim Thome isn't going anywhere at DH. Hack-at-everything 3B Joe Crede is back after missing almost all of last season. That leaves Fields to battle with Jerry Owens for that last outfield spot. Owens is a Guillen favorite. And it's obvious why: with his free-swinging approach and speed, Owens must remind Guillen of Pierre.
Even if Fields does beat out Owens this spring, he's never going to hit for average striking out so often. And he's going to hit in the bottom half of the order, limiting chances for RBIs and runs. Plenty of owners consider Fields a top 15 third baseman because of his 23 homers in two-thirds of a season. But you shouldn't consider him as anything more than a late-round flier.



Comments (7)
By Low...Mike Lamb....he now has a full time job...
Jimmer69 IS Darth Caedus! | 02/29/08, 10:38 AM
Report Offensive CommentI don't understand the "sell high" philosophy on Josh Fields and Daric Barton.
When both of them have done very little in their very short major league careers.
They should be "buy low" or not even even talked about in this article at all. Both of their potential is phenomenal, but their stock is as low as it will ever be!
Sell High should be about guys whose stocks are high!
Right?
joeg2984 | 03/03/08, 07:35 AM
Report Offensive Comment@ joeg2984
You raise an interesting point, one I'll address in our next installment. (But if I could channel Steven A. for a moment), HOWEVER, I would respond with two comments:
1. Buy Low/Sell High is all about perception. For instance, maybe you have Brad Ausmus as your No. 2 catcher in a deep league, and he hits three HRs in the first week of the season. On paper he's a sell-high candidate, but at this point pretty much every fantasy owner in the world is savvy enough to realize this is a fluke, and you're not going to be able to move him for more than a ham sandwich. While I don't consider it the Gospel, MockDraftCentral.com shows Fields going 12th among third basemen, which I believe is madness. Even though his limited track record doesn't paint an impressive picture, Fields' perception in the eyes of many owners is very high because of his potential over his first full season. If you got him on Draft Day, I think you could clearly move him for a superior talent right now.
2. I'm only addressing non-keeper leagues and 2008 value in 5x5 leagues. (I'd turn to Kevin Goldstein of Baseball Prospectus for long-term prospect potential.) And I think it's pretty common, especially in recent years, for young players to be overvalued in keeper leagues. (For the record, I like Barton long-term. Fields, not so much, especially if he stays with the White Sox.)
Gary Gramling | 03/03/08, 03:11 PM
Report Offensive CommentMr Gramling needs to do his homework. Fields is going to be the White Sox full time 3rd baseman, not an option in the outfield. He's not even being considered for the outfield and hasn't been for awhile. Crede (Boras client, back injury, slow as h*ll)) is trade bait. Fields is going to have a monster year.
HORGH | 03/04/08, 02:22 PM
Report Offensive CommentHomework done and then some HORGH.
Just spent last week in Tucson, and while Crede remains firmly on the trading block, he's unlikely to draw the kind of return Kenny Williams is looking for. Right now, San Fran is the only serious suitor, and they seem to be warming up to the idea of Eugenio Velez as their very own Chone Figgins. And remember, if the Sox don't give away Crede, they at least get draft picks when he leaves as a free agent next winter. Crede might be moved, but I only put it at 50/50.
Now I'm not saying Fields is a lock to be sitting. But Crede is a Guillen type of player (great contact rate, strong defense). And Jerry Owens is a Guillen type of player (good contact rate, speed, defense). Fields is talented, but with his high strikeout rate and (to put it as nicely as possible) outright brutal defense, he's most certainly not a Guillen type of player.
I obviously can't say with 100 percent certainty what's going to happen, but I'm just connecting the dots and it doesn???t look good for Fields.
(Also, Fields doesn't need to spend the spring in left field to be able to play their again in '08. It's the easiest position to transition to in baseball and he spent 21 games their last year.)
Gary Gramling | 03/04/08, 05:13 PM
Report Offensive CommentCarlos Quentin anyone ??? I thought he was starting in LF, heard ozzie is pretty high on him.
JV87 | 03/11/08, 11:29 AM
Report Offensive CommentPoint made Gary, however I still maintain that Fields is NOT an option for Kenny Williams in left. At worst, he'll start at third for AAA.
I agree with JV, look for Carlos Quentin in Left.
Just please, please not Pablo Osuna..please..
HORGH | 03/13/08, 05:31 PM
Report Offensive CommentAdd a comment
Remember to keep it clean. Bad words will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed. More Guidelines