Throwdowns > Completed

Views
6
Comments
10
  • May 17, 2008 12:49 PM ET

Worst Team to ever make it to the NBA Finals

blazerboy/oaklanddude (16-17-3) vs Civardi (112-90-12)
2
Votes
8
Votes
2
Votes
8
Votes


State first argue second

The 2006-2007 Cleveland Cavs


My pick-

1970-71 Baltimore Bullets


The Cavs got SWEPT by an entirely better team. Lebron may have been the best player in the series but as you can see it was just him. The Cavs had no depth to compare to Spurs. They got walloped. It was obvious that the Cavs werent ready to play at that level. Then u may say how did they get to that level? LeBron was able to play well enough to keep the games against the Pistons close enough that when the 4th quarter came along Lebron was able to win the game with his clutch factor.

You may also say that the S.A. Spurs were an exceptional team that year and would have beat the pistons if they made it to that level. But if you look at it the Suns or the Jazz could have swept this team as well:
Suns
The advantage at PG with Nash would have ripped apart the Cavs. Big Z is not athletic enough to stop amare. Shawn Marion would have been very physical with Lebron. As you can see that almost worked for the Washinton Wizards this year if only Areanas wasnt injured. Plus they wouldnt have enough defense to stop the high-scoring Suns.

Jazz:
Again the PG match-up would prove horrible for the Cavs. And do you really see Boozer getting slowed downed by Gooden? Out of Room see next arguement


First off the Bullets went 42-40 in the season they reached the finals,and like the Cavs they lost in four straight games.Unlike the Cavs the Bullets only had six players who scored over 10 points per game.I mean half the team scored under 10 points,had less then 5 rebounds,and had under two assist.The leading scorer scored just over 20 points,so less compair both teams starters

PG-Kevin Loughery wasent even a true point guard,he scored 15 points evry game but had only three assist,at least the Cavs used Gibson and Jones whos numbers are double those of Loughery's

SG:This is one of the few postions the Bullets had a good player at in Earl Monroe,who was one of the top players of all time so I wont even argue here.

SF:Come on the bullets started Jack Marin who scored 18 points a game,but wasent one of the best players at that time.But with the Cavs they had King James,one of if not the Best player of all time.

PF:Gus Johnson was a solid player who averaged 18 points and had an all star season that year with 17 rebounds every game,on the other hand the Cavs had Gooden and Newble playing the game who had over 20 rebounds.

The Bullets were worse then thge Cavs 4-2


The regular season stats are horrible for the Cavs too. Yes they did get the the 4 seed HOWEVER the Cavs were playing in a weak Eastern conference they manged their wins by playing horrible teams in their diviosn and conference.

Gooden and Newble had over 20 rebounds? Not on your life. Newble is a bench player who rarely sees action.

AND AS YOU SAID the Bullets not one BUT TWO allstars. 3 of the four starters you mentioned were solid plyaers that scored over 15 points a night! Who is the center of this team?


"Gooden and Newble had over 20 rebounds? Not on your life. Newble is a bench player who rarely sees action"

Gooden averaged 12 and Newble averaged 8. somethin so yes it did happen.

Even though the Cavs played in the weak eastern confernce they still went 50-32 which is a good record.On the other hand the Bullits won there divison but only went 42-40.Plus the only good team in there confernce was the Knicks so it was just as bad then as it is now.

Even with two all stars the Bullets had no depth past there starting lineup with only one bench player scoring in double figures and the rest scoring under 8 points,not even getting two assist or two rebounds.On the other hand the Cavs were one of the deepest teams in the NBA.Players like Varejao and other players that were way better then all the bums the Bullets had as backups that wouldnt even be in the NBA today.

In all the Cavs were better then the Bullets,therfore the Baltimore Bullets were the worst NBA Final team ever

May 17, 2008  01:22 PM ET

cavs

May 17, 2008  01:27 PM ET

The 2001-2002 Nets were absolutely horrid.

May 17, 2008  01:27 PM ET

the cavs were a one man team

nets had rj,kidd,dikembe,kmart

May 17, 2008  01:28 PM ET

the 96 bulls

May 17, 2008  01:32 PM ET

the cavs have nobody other than lebron

May 17, 2008  02:17 PM ET

Bullets didnt have a superstar like James

May 17, 2008  02:18 PM ET

Nets werent horrible at all, Angelos

May 17, 2008  02:28 PM ET

Just because they got swept and were essentially a one man team doesn't mean they were the worst. Teams have somehow made it to the finals with even less talent than the cavs before

May 17, 2008  04:48 PM ET

Like the Bullets.........

 
May 17, 2008  07:30 PM ET

02 Nets. Todd McCullough vs. Shaq in the Finals. Biggest mismatch in NBA Finals history

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Leaderboard

  Fan W L T Win %
1 DetroitFan* BS: Start Stanton! 132 9 7 91.6%
2 Porkins: Catches bullets 138 13 1 91.1%
3 Baun-ded=PUCKHEAD 52 5 1 90.5%
4 The Ram 138 17 4 88.1%
5 Foosball 68 9 2 87.3%
6 Philly-- www.sportsnoise.com 74 11 4 85.4%
7 Hyped78 112 19 5 84.2%
8 Dookie: Here We Go Steelers 117 19 8 84.0%
9 [The] Coach 97 18 5 82.9%
10 BSchwartz07 129 27 6 81.5%

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Jerry tries to pep up sulking T.O.
    Views
    7148
    Comments
    1115
  2. 2
    Brewers considering run at Sabathia
    Views
    3150
    Comments
    499
  3. 3
    Lions will listen to offers for Williams
    Views
    21780
    Comments
    78
  4. 4
    Media angers Cowboys coach
    Views
    10712
    Comments
    68
  5. 5
    Kobe causes logjam at small forward
    Views
    8653
    Comments
    55

Weekly Most Active Users

Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Blogs