Ghost. Done. won the Throwdown.
Throwndowns: 58
Record: 43 - 12 - 3
Scranton, PA
All Throwdowns
21
Votes
Throwndowns: 206
Record: 162 - 36 - 8
Miami, FL
All Throwdowns
13
Votes

I'm settling this once and for all. Who is the most underrated NBA player?


I have seen countless throwdowns with this topic, yet no one has attempted to argue for the player I'm about to mention.

My Mr. Underrated averaged 19 points, 5 rebounds, and 4 assists this past season. He had an efficiency rating of +18.93, which is better than other "underrated" players such as Michael Redd, Luke Walton, and Leandro Barbosa.

My guy is also an iron man. He played in every single game this year for...the Pacers. I am referring to Michael Dunleavy, Jr. I bet 95% of you didn't have a clue that he had such a stat line. Some of you probably didn't even know he played for Indiana. He's so underrated that he doesn't even get mentioned in throwdowns such as this one.

According to 82games.com, the Pacers score 9 less points every 100 possessions that Mike is NOT on the floor. What does that tell me? It tells me that he's valuable to his team. That stat of his is better than Tracy McGrady's, Baron Davis's, Ray Allen's, and Tim Duncan's.

Mike Dunleavy is, by far, the most underrated player in the League. He gets no credit outside of a few fans in Indianapolis, yet puts up better stats than many other players. He was Indiana's MVP this year, and deserves credit.


Good choice GOAT, and I agree with you on principle, Dunleavy didn't recieve much attention nor credit for his accomplishments this year...

However how do we know this season was not a "fluke"? Or even if he did improve, how do we know he'll be consistant?

06/ 07- 11.4/ 14.0 ppg
05-06- 11.5 ppg
04-05- 13.4 ppg
03-04- 11.7 ppg

See a trend here? Not so impressive numbers right? So, whenever a player posts up different stats than what he's put throughout his career , it's very dangerous to OVERrate him, because we don't know what will come next year...

BUT let's only consider the player's production from this year,


My guy was way overlooked this past year because his team sucks.

His name only comes up when people laugh at it.

He's a Small Forward, but in a year where Bargnani, Aldridge, Roy, Redick, Farmar, Foye, Thomas came out in the draft, he's always forgotten.

After the team star got traded, he is, in my opinion, the best player on that team...and yet few remember him and his stats even less...

20.1 ppg / 6.2 rpg/ 2.0 apg / 1.37 spg

He is a versatile SF with speed, solid shooter (46% FG) and a great low post game.

My guy is Rudy Gay.


Your choice was a good one as well, Ghost. However, Rudy Gay's stats make him look better than what he really is.

Gay is a slasher in the lane so it's quite obvious that he would have a solid shooting percentage. But his other shooting percentages are not so glamorous. Let's compare...

Dunleavy: 42% 3PT, 83% FT
Gay: 35% 3PT, 79% FT

I know those aren't gigantic differences, but it still somewhat puts down your saying he's a solid shooter. (Dunks are pretty high-percentage shots.)

You mentioned how Dunleavy hasn't had these numbers for more than a year. Surprisingly, his scoring is really the only stat that has changed a lot. His rebounds and assists have been there for most of his career. Gay, on the other hand, is still a little unproven in the League. It is, after all, HIS first year with such numbers. So I ask you, how do we know Gay isn't a "fluke"?

I'll end with this: Is Gay all that valuable to the Grizzlies? In my opinion, he is not. In fact, according to my trust site, 82games, Memphis has a BETTER points differential when he is NOT on the floor.

His stats look nice, but, unfortunately for him, they don't tell anywhere near the whole story.


And yet Gay is the leading scorer (even when Gasol was with the team).

3rd in rebounds.

1st in steals.

2nd in blocks (behind Milicic).

Gay was more essential to the Grizzlies and played a bigger role. While Pacers have a much better team and many weapons, the Grizz obviously don't....

And for you to be able to carry a team, lead them when you're one of the few bright spots in your team in your 2nd year...well that speaks volume; for that's something Dunleavy has only started doing years into the NBA.

And for you to be able to continue posting up decent numbers when the team's offensive weapons have been traded away, well that also speaks for itself; for Gay plays a central key role for the Griz while Dunleavy has always been considered and played like a supporting cast.

Bottom line is this, Gay scores more and rebounds more in a worse team.


And addressing:

" Memphis has a BETTER points differential when he is NOT on the floor."

- Gay played 81 games in the year, and 37 minutes of 48. So you're statement could be misinterpreted as you have, for Gay is usually out of the game when it's almost over...opponent doesn't care anymore, they've won.


Leading Memphis in scoring even with Gasol is nothing spectacular. Pau only averaged 20 points a game twice in his entire career and not once in the last three seasons.

Dunleavy is second in scoring on Indiana, but he is second to another somewhat underrated player, Danny Granger. However, unlike the situation with Gasol, Granger was a 20 ppg scorer this year.

Also, I'm not buying that crap that the opponents don't care at the end of games. It's true they lost quite a bit, but it's not like they got killed every game. Besides, Dunleavy has played LESS minutes on a terrible team in a weaker Eastern conference.

Next, the Pacers do NOT have "many weapons". If they did, they would have made the playoffs. They have Dunleavy and Granger. O'Neal is overrated if anything and doesn't help them very much.

Gay may score ONE point more and grab ONE rebound more, but Dunleavy does the rest. He makes his team better, dishes out more assists, and is doing more with less talent.

More importantly, Gay is mentioned around the League as an up-and-coming superstar. When did Dunleavy ever receive such praise? Never. He is as good as Gay and is DEFINITELY more underrated. Case closed.


So are you seriously trying to sell that Indiana is a worst team? When they just barely missed the playoffs by a game???

Are you saying Granger, O'Neal, Tinsley, Murphy are all worse offensive weapons than the Grizz's? When all of these avg double figures??

We all know the Grizz as a team is worse, their stats and their record proves it.

We all know supporting cast improves a player success, and Indy's is better.

We all know the West is tougher, the rosters prove it.

We all know the Grizz's main offensive weapon was traded away, the Lakers' success proves it.

And YET Gay has posted more points, rebounds, steals, blocks,...producing much more in a worst team.

Do YOU think Dunleavy would have the same success as Gay in the Grizzlies???

And WOULD so many people put Dunleavy in their fantasy team if they thought he sucked?

And yet Gay put up better numbers and plays a bigger role on the team...so not only is Gay a better player but more underrated as well.

FINAL NOTE:

Dunleavy - $ 8,219,008
Gay - $2,411,160

+ Gay is a better player
+ Gay produces more with a lower contract
+ bigger role on a worse team

= Underrated

Good luck, Ghost. I've been wanting to TD against you for awhile.

Report Offensive Comment

Thanks GOAT, good luck as well!

Report Offensive Comment

I'm leaning to the left, but I'll wait for some more arguements.

Report Offensive Comment

Gay is the better player, but Dunleavy is the more underrated player.

Those helium aricles sure do come in handy.

Report Offensive Comment

I must say Dunleavy saved a fantasy team of mine. He is not underrated in my book.

Report Offensive Comment

Chengy, he's not underrated in your mind? Just because you know he's good doesn't mean everyone else realizes this. By the way, he also helped my fantasy team this past season.

Report Offensive Comment

Both picks are very solid picks. And good to see you guys didn't pick all-stars, because I've seen too many "underrated NBA player" TDs where guys just choose all-stars which aren't, at all, underrated.

Report Offensive Comment

I agree, Hyped. Those are dumb picks for such a throwdown. Honestly though, I was kind of hoping for an all-Indiana Pacers throwdown: Mike Dunleavy vs. Danny Granger. haha

Report Offensive Comment

This is my rebuttal to your final argument, Ghost:

Please, find one place in my argument where I claimed Indiana had a worse team. Find it. I dare you. Also, you kind of shot yourself in the foot by saying the Grizzlies play in a tough conference. Therefore, their record will be worse than that of a team with the same amount of talent in the Eastern Conference.

You mentioned all those players for Indy. Is one of them (besides the washed-up O'Neal) an all-star? No, I didn't think so.

Yes, I think Dunleavy would have done just as well if not won a few more games for Memphis had he been in Gay's situation.

Next, I can't honestly believe you brought fantasy sports into this. There are 10 teams in my League. 12 players to a team. That means people think Dunleavy is in the top 120 when, in actuality, he is much higher which further proves his being underrated. Fantasty leagues are so different that there is no way you can compare though. Rudy Gay was probably even more of a hot commodity in the leagues than Dunleavy.

Salaries are irrelevant in this discussion. We are talking about people underrating them and how good they truly are, not how much money they get.

Report Offensive Comment

1) The Grizz play in a tougher conference and still Gay posts up better stats.

2) Salaries arent irrelevant since it's people who make the contracts and who decide the player's value.

3) You made them come out to seem as if Indy has a horrible team, and it's just not true, they have a better supporting cast, and like I said it helps, whereas in Memphis, who do they have to help out Gay? Navarro? Miller?!?!

Report Offensive Comment

Awesome TD by the way, congrats.

Report Offensive Comment

This shouldn't be as lopsided as it is...but it looks like I'll be contributing to the disparity.

I did really like the argument made by Ghost about Dunleavy potentially being a one hit wonder, but as GOAT said, couldn't the same be said for Rudy Gay?

Report Offensive Comment

Yeah, same to you. Good job.

1) These stats of his aren't a lot better, and I've already shown in the second argument that his stats are somewhat misleading.

2) I just thought of something regarding salaries. Isn't Rudy Gay still in his rookie contract? Therefore, there's no way he could be getting a large sum of money. Kind of unfair, don't ya think? Nonetheless, I still think they're irrelevant.

3) Any team that doesn't make the playoffs in the Eastern Conference is, in my mind, a terrible team! haha. On the flip side, Miller is decent.

Report Offensive Comment

Didn't see Mike Dunleavy coming, nice job GOAT. Vote left.

Report Offensive Comment

Vote left, because I knew about Rudy Gay, and I really didn't know about Dunleavy, and I'm a fan of his.

Report Offensive Comment

"is doing more with less talent"

I disagree with that whole heartedly, who does memphis have that is better than Indiana's guys. I mean Dunleavy isn't even the best player on his team.

Report Offensive Comment

I disagree with that whole heartedly, who does memphis have that is better than Indiana's guys. I mean Dunleavy isn't even the best player on his team.
nickb23 | 06/01/08, 02:14 PM

That's his point right there...

Report Offensive Comment

"I really didn't know about Dunleavy, and I'm a fan of his."- hemo


That makes NO sense, you didn't know about him but are a fan of his. Really??

Report Offensive Comment

Dunleavy isn't the best on his team?

And so the underrating continues. (By the way, Mike Miller is quite good.)

Report Offensive Comment
 

What dfan????

Report Offensive Comment

Add a comment

Remember to keep it clean. Bad words will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed. More Guidelines


or cancel