FanNation - The Republic of Sport

Goodell: PULL THE TRIGGER said 06/05, 10:53 AM
QB - Dan Marino ( 1984-85): Over 9000 yds passing, 78 TD's, 96.5 QB rating

RB - Thurman Thomas (1991-92): Over 4000 Yards from scrimmage...Wanna talk about catching and rushing. Oh yeah, he was the NFL MVP in 1991

RB - LT (2005-06): I picked different years than you. Over 4000 yds from scrimmage and 51 TD's

WR - Jerry Rice (1986-87): 37 TD's in only 28 games. Over that span he averaged 95 yds per game. He also averaged just under 20 yds per REC

WR - Cris Carter (1994-95): For those 2 season's he averaged 109 REC, 1314 yds, and 12 TD's.

WR - Marvin Harrison (2001-2002): For the same reason's as you....

Dont even get me started on Marino vs Farve....Lets look at how many INTS and sack each QB gave up during thier respective 2 year span

Marino - 38 INTs and only 21 sacks

Farve - 26 INTS and sacked 77 times

Now 38 INTS might look bad, but thats compared to 78 TD's, so that a 2-1 ratio which is about as good as your gonna get. Marino also didnt have any sort of running game. Those years for Brett he had Edgar Bennett and Dorsey Levens, who were pretty good for thier respective time frame

Goodell: PULL THE TRIGGER said 06/05, 03:44 PM
Lets look at sacks, shall we??

Marino - 21 Sacks in 2 seasons

Favre - 77 Sacks in 2 seasons

Favre was sacked over 3 times MORE than Marino.....Thats a startling stat CONSIDERING the best DE in game during those times was on his team. He didnt even have to line up against Reggie White during that span..... He got to play against 2nd rate DE's week in and week out and was still put on his **** an average of 2.5 times per game.....On the other hand Marino was sacked about 0.6 times per game. Thats a difference of about 500%.....Yes, thats FIVE-HUNDRED Percent increase from Marino to Favre

You want to bloat the INT number's against Marino when favre is the NFL's all time INT leader....Nice try

Marshall Faulk = Thurman Thomas reincarnated.....They are about equal on the skill level. Marshall had a much better O-Line in STL than Thurman did in Buffalo. Thurman's OL was a tad bit better than average, as Marhsall got to play with 2 HOF lineman in Slater and Pace

Goodell: PULL THE TRIGGER said 06/05, 04:43 PM
Hutson vs Carter must go beyond the numbers....Hutson played less games per season, the NFL wasnt as pass happy back then....Blah, Blah, Blah.

In the overall spectrum, Hutson is the better ALL TIME WR. That I wont argue, or try to argue. However, for the given years that we both picked, Carter is hands down the better WR. I didnt need to worry about TD's when I picked Carter, cause Rice and Harrison are all the deep threat I need. Carter is and always will be a better POS WR than Hutson. More REC's means better possesion ratio. Again, overall Hutson is the better of the 2, over the middle Carter is the better of the 2

You are right...Hutson did lead the NFL in all those stats for those seasons. But look at his competition. He never had to line up agaisnt Deion Sanders or Darrell Green. He never had to compete with Andre Reed, Jerry Rice, Tim Brown, Irving Fryar, Herman Moore, Flipper Anderson, Mark Duper and So on. Hutson was the best of his time because the field was soooo thin. Im not saying he isnt great, just Carter had a little harder time getting those numbers.

Good TD