Views
13
Comments
17
  • December 03, 2007 04:14 PM ET

College Football is the only sport that can't decide their National Championship on the field

YDT8523 (16-30-1) vs powersj13 BS (62-31-6)
10
Votes
5
Votes
10
Votes
5
Votes


College Football can't seem to determine how their National championship will be decided.

Yesterday Ohio State and LSU were announced as the 2 teams that will battle for the National Championship.

Ohio State won the Big 10 Confernence despite the fact that they beat nobody. And they lost to Illinois at home before beating Michigan.

LSU won the SEC despite the fact they lost to Kentucky and Arkansas in 3 Overtimes. Plus Arkansas beat LSU at home late.

Georgia, Oklahoma, Kansas, USC, and Virginia Tech all think they should play for the National Championship.

Georgia and Kansas did not win their confernence and didn't win their division.

Virginia Tech lost big to LSU. USC lost to Stanford at home. And Oklahoma lost both of their games on the road including Texas Tech in which Sam Bradford was knock out of the game.

There is now the possibilty of a 2 loss team winning the National Championship if LSU beats Ohio State at home in New Orleans.

Something needs to be done to better determine the National Championship on the field, not with polls or computers.


It's not College Football with the problem it's us fans that have the issue with how the National Championship will be decided. College football has it right.

College football is interesting in many ways. One is that every week acts as a playoff game. You can't fault the BCS because West Virginia decided to choke or that Missouri was a little overrated. Nor can you fault them because being a #2 team was a jinx. The fact that 10 teams had an argument about making the National Championship game isn't a bad thing, in my opinion.

Fact is, whether you like it or not, Bowl games generate too much money revenue for cities and universities involved. And it gives you a chance to see some very good matchups between conferences that would never otherwise get a chance to play eachother.


This year is a perfect example why the national championship wouldn't be settle on the field.

You have 1 team that lost 1 game. A Hawaii team that went undefeated, but can't play for the National Championship because they didn't play anybody. And a bunch of 2 loss teams.

The reason there isn't a playoff is because the lousy school presidents don't wanted one even thought they will make a lot of money if there is one.

One thing the BCS needs to do is have a rule in which if you are going to play for the National championship you must win your conference. I know the ACC, Big 12, and SEC have conference championship games, and the Big East, Big 10, and Pac 10 don't. But you can't have teams playing for the National championship without winning your own conference. It almost happen with Georgia.


<font color="red">Forfeited Turn</font>


A playoff is not going to happen anytime soon. But at some point college football has to have a better plan to determine the National championship on the field. The more chaos in the BCS, the faster we get a playoff.


I forgot all about this TD...sorry for the delay.

A Playoff won't prove anything. If this year taught us anything it was that any given Saturday an App St or a Stanfod win can happen. College footbll acts as a playoff system from week to week. So if a 6 seed beat a 1 seed in the playoffs, everyone would be saying that it is a fluke and the controversy would still be there. If you want to go to the National Championship game and not leave the bowl games in the hands of the committee, then don't lose....

What about seeding? How would you pick playoff teams? How many, who would get left out? Playoffs are not the answer. Seldom does the #1 seed in any playoff and any other collegiate sport win the National Championship... it doesn't prove anything.

December 3, 2007  04:54 PM ET

The NBA decides their Champion in a court
Nascar decides their champion in a track
Tennis on a court
Golf on a course

That is 4 so far that do not decide their Champion on a field, ergo, College Footbal cannot be the only one!

lol

December 3, 2007  04:55 PM ET

Check the typos, NBA is "on" a court and Nascar "on" a track of course!

December 3, 2007  04:56 PM ET

Playoff System necessary.
117 teams go into Thunderdome...one team comes out!

December 3, 2007  04:56 PM ET

Yeah but you can fault Ohio State for a schedule full of cupcake games.

December 3, 2007  05:00 PM ET

Regular season losses shouldnt be the sole determining factor. I have no problem with a two loss team the quality of LSU playing in the game. Their two losses were in triple OT and they played a quality schedule.

Now, are they DEFINITELY worthy of the game over some of the other teams you mentioned and others (USC comes to mind). We'll never know. Without a playoff system , this is as good as we get. A paper championship.

December 3, 2007  05:11 PM ET

I wonder how many people were complaining after Texas-USC, Miami-Ohio State and Texas-Michigan. The BCS is still better then the bowl system in the past when none of those matchups would have occured. I really don't see anything more then a +1 system happening in the near future anyway.

December 3, 2007  05:28 PM ET

I wonder how many people were complaining after Texas-USC, Miami-Ohio State and Texas-Michigan. The BCS is still better then the bowl system in the past when none of those matchups would have occured. I really don't see anything more then a +1 system happening in the near future anyway.

TradeAngelos | 12/03

You don't see anything more than a +1 system, because thats what the powers that be want you to believe. They never before have felt the pressure to scrap the Bowl system like they are at this moment. They know there is no more or less justification for LSU-Ohio State in the championship game than any of the other top ten teams. The reason you keep hearing "its not going to happen" is because they are trying to stamp out any hope. The more outcry for a playoff and pressure they come under the more determined they "sound", but to me it sounds like a last desperate attempt to hang on to they old ways. The more patronizing and condescending they are about the BCS the more faith I have that its going to change. It will collapse under its own awesome stupidity. They wanted parity. they got it, but they've succeeded in destroying their only means of justifying selection over playoff.

December 3, 2007  05:32 PM ET

Yeah but you can fault Ohio State for a schedule full of cupcake games.

T-fo | 12/03/07

Tell that to Hawaii

December 3, 2007  05:34 PM ET

i think georgia and maybe VT could beat just about anyone right now

Vt got killed by LSU but LSU played a perfect game and VT wasn't themselves

December 3, 2007  05:34 PM ET

of course it isn't settled on the field. or Hawaii would be in the NC game.

December 3, 2007  05:36 PM ET

he he, i agree hokie guy VT is a different team than it was in september. A big weight is off their shoulders and the team is healthy.

December 3, 2007  05:38 PM ET

YDT is doesn't matter if a two loss team wins the championship when there are so many quality two loss teams, everyone, except Hawaii, got beat up this year.

December 3, 2007  05:39 PM ET

Hey I know a way to match up teams from different conferences....a playoff.
Just think. Instead of teams from various colleges and conferences playing each other in meaningless bowl games and having one game that really matters. Have your top 8 or sixteen teams play in a playoff where every game matters....A LOT. The colleges that don't get invited to the playoff get to still go to a meaningless bowl game and whoever like to attend those meaningless bowls will undoubtably still attend.

December 3, 2007  05:50 PM ET

I know its not an original idea. I'm just acting like it is since its such a simple solution. And would be a money makin' mothafukka'.

December 3, 2007  07:51 PM ET

Its a web of insanity for every team:

Missouri beats Illinois who beats Ohio St
Missouri beats Kansas
Missouri losses to OU who lost to CU and TT while mizzou beat em by a combined score of 100 to 16.

So although Missouri couldnt beat OU head to head whose the better team, the one that took care of business and then choked in two of the three biggest games of the year, or the one who took care of the toughest games and couldnt handle the lesser ones.

I dont even know and im totally 100 % biased.

Whats your guys's team's story?

We all have great arguements but were left with this crappy system!

December 3, 2007  07:52 PM ET

**** So although Missouri couldnt beat OU head to head, whose the better team?

 
December 7, 2007  10:11 PM ET

4 to 6 team playoff would be good. The more teams you have in a playoff, the more the problems introduced by a playoff are exaggerated.

Historically, it is a stretch just to find 6 viable teams in a given year. Even this year, you can easily reduce the filed to 6 just by eliminating teams that didn't win their conference and teams that met during the regular season.

And besides, does any 2 loss team really deserve a shot at the title? (I am not even fond of seeing 1 loss teams play, but unless you buy into Hawaii or Kansas's argument, someone has to play...)

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Leaderboard

  Fan W L T Win %
1 Porkins... 157 14 1 91.6%
2 YODA 48 4 2 90.7%
3 Baun-de... 68 7 2 89.6%
4 The Ram 152 17 4 89.0%
5 FoosBal... 84 12 2 86.7%
6 Hyped78 132 19 5 86.2%
7 PhillyE... 78 11 4 86.0%
8 Dookie: Here We Go Steelers 119 19 8 84.2%
9 [The] Coach 106 18 5 84.1%
10 Sooner in WA- Rightful Champ 55 13 3 79.6%

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Giants open to Plaxico return
    Views
    6549
    Comments
    1632
  2. 2
    Pedroia could have held out for more
    Views
    5195
    Comments
    1005
  3. 3
    Emmitt: Current Cowboys just 'mediocre'
    Views
    2082
    Comments
    607
  4. 4
    Yankees to meet with Sabathia
    Views
    1173
    Comments
    382
  5. 5
    Why Notre Dame kept Weis
    Views
    18559
    Comments
    130

Most Active Users

Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns

  1. 1
    _ _ _ _ _
  2. 2
    bcoltrinari
  3. 3
    Epoch1
  4. 4
    Dyhard: Big 10/ACC Challenge
  5. 5
    Homey Deez

Message Boards

  1. MMA > Fight Club

    Where does Torres stack up?
    Views
    528
    Replies
    7
  2. MMA > Fight Club

    WEC smart to not pursue…
    Views
    415
    Replies
    3
  3. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    Tommy Tuberville Fired from…
    Views
    314
    Replies
    34

Blogs