Views
17
Comments
4
  • December 09, 2007 10:41 AM ET

Tiger Woods will win more Major championships than Roger Federer will win Grand Slams

YDT8523 (16-30-1) vs Brewman: Go Packers! (18-22-0)
10
Votes
3
Votes
10
Votes
3
Votes


When all said and done, Tiger Woods will win more Major championships than Roger Federer will win Grand Slams.

The self life of a tennis player is much shorter than a golfer.

Right Now Tiger has 13 major championships and Federer has 12 Grand Slam titles.

When both of them are at 40 years of age, Tiger would still be playing at a high level and Federer will not.


I say Roger Federer will win more.

He is an amazing tennis player and he is just outstanding at what he does.

He will lead himself to more major championships than Woods will.


Woods will play more longer than Federer because Golf is not as demanding as Tennis.

Pete Sampas won 14 Grand Slam titles, but he didn't play past his 30th birthday.

Woods will win probably around over 20 major championships, while Federer will win probably around 15 to 20 Grand Slam titles.



10 years from now Tiger Woods will still be playing and winning major championships. While Roger Federer will retired with the Most Grand Slams titles between 15 and 20.


<font color="red">Forfeited Turn</font>

Comments (4) Add A Comment

December 9, 2007  11:35 AM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

Naturally, Woods will get more. Woods can play at a high level for at least 10 years, whereas Federer will have probably only 4-6 years of dominance left, if that, witj new superstars like Nadal, Djokovic, and a plethora of other young, talented players.

December 9, 2007  11:49 AM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

YTD is on the money. Tiger will get more, considering that big flabby dudes in their forties can win golf majors, whereas tennis actually involves a high level of athleticism. By the time Federer reaches 30, he will get surpassed by some guys in their early-to-mid 20s (if not the very two mentioned by Bargnani) if only because he will lose a step or two.

All that said, Federer is even more dominant in his prime than Tiger Woods, and deserves even more accolades.

December 9, 2007  01:32 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

Its just a total lack of common sense to go with Federer.

 
December 9, 2007  01:57 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

Good idea for a TD, most original one in a while.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Leaderboard

  Fan W L T Win %
1 Porkins... 156 14 1 91.5%
2 YODA 48 4 2 90.7%
3 Baun-de... 68 7 2 89.6%
4 The Ram 151 17 4 89.0%
5 FoosBal... 84 12 2 86.7%
6 Hyped78 132 19 5 86.2%
7 PhillyE... 78 11 4 86.0%
8 Dookie: Here We Go Steelers 119 19 8 84.2%
9 [The] Coach 106 18 5 84.1%
10 Sooner in WA- Rightful Champ 55 13 3 79.6%

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Giants open to Plaxico return
    Views
    5242
    Comments
    1619
  2. 2
    Pedroia could have held out for more
    Views
    3867
    Comments
    1001
  3. 3
    Why Notre Dame kept Weis
    Views
    14093
    Comments
    118
  4. 4
    Stars don't want Avery back
    Views
    6477
    Comments
    101
  5. 5
    Marbury: Play me or waive me
    Views
    12666
    Comments
    65

Most Active Users

Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns

  1. 1
    _ _ _ _ _
  2. 2
    bcoltrinari
  3. 3
    Epoch1
  4. 4
    Dyhard: Big 10/ACC Challenge
  5. 5
    Vice President Corky

Message Boards

  1. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    Tommy Tuberville Fired from…
    Views
    274
    Replies
    31

  2. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    BCS just declared Germany the…
    Views
    48
    Replies
    9

  3. NFL > Green Bay Packers

    Fire Packer Management/Coach
    Views
    43
    Replies
    1

Blogs

SI.com

Swimsuit

Carmella GarciaCarmella Garcia
Marlina MorenoMarlina Moreno

SI Photos

Cheerleader of the WeekCheerleader of the Week
O.J. Simpson's Fall from GraceO.J. Simpson's Fall from Grace